Another great post from our guest blogger, Richele Dunavent!
After one month of Project GLAD implementation
in a first grade co-teaching classroom I am excited to share that the level of
student engagement is extremely high as well as the level of authentic academic
language use in context. The unit being taught during this time period was
about economics. This unit hit all of the expectations of the first grade
Social Studies Essential Standard of 1.E.1 understand basic economic concepts
and its three clarifying objectives. We began the unit by teaching one or two
academic terms using the Cognitive Content Dictionary (CCD) that I mentioned in
my last blog. Another strategy we used was a teacher created big book about the
topic "producers". These big books are specific to the lesson,
provide authentic images of the topic, and the text is relevant, informative,
and the main idea is summarized in a repetitive pattern on each page. Students
noticed this repetition and wondered about that. After we read the book
together, I asked them to put their heads together and talk about why the book
might repeat that one sentence on each page. Many of the students were very
astute and realized that the repetition was to teach the important information,
or the main idea and key details. The unit progressed through topics like
producer/consumer, supply/demand, and goods/services using another strategy
called a Comparative Input Chart. This strategy is especially helpful because
it is preplanned and all of the information is penciled in prior to the lesson
with sketches, labels and captions. It is also color coded for each chunk of
the lesson. The similarities and differences between or among the topics or
ideas are identified on this chart. These charts were left hanging on the walls
for quick reference as students discussed the topics or wrote in their response
journals.
The final strategy used in this unit
was the Cooperative Strip Paragraph which had student teams compose a
collaborative sentence in reference to the topic sentence that was written by
the classroom teacher. Each team of students was given a different colored
sentence strip for their response. They received teacher assistance from the
adults in the classroom to actually write the sentence. Students are brought
into close proximity of the pocket chart where all of the sentence strips were
added to the topic sentence to form a paragraph. Time was spent over the next
several days editing the sentences as a whole group activity. Sentence strips were
torn into separate pieces as words were added or taken away. The CCD and the
Comparison Input Charts were referred to throughout this editing process in
order to create a cohesive, informative paragraph. Again, students were highly
engaged and there were ample opportunities for all students to practice using
academic vocabulary in context.
No comments:
Post a Comment